Are Shortened Links the new ‘Cue Cat’? 

If you use Twitter, you sooner or later start bumping up against the 140 character limit, especially if you are in the habit of referring followers to articles you’ve found on the web.  By the time this has been an issue, you have probably moved on to a twitter client, like Tweetdeck, that has built in tools – and choice – for shortening URLs, such a Twurl, tr.im and tinyURL.

What these services do is take links and reduce them down to aliases, not unlike hyperlinking in this article with alternate naming.

The difference is that when I alias a link here in this article, you can hover over it and get an idea of where you are going.  With link shortening within Twitter – and increasingly the other areas where it can be found around the web – the destination is typically obscured.

Now folks are starting to look at the monetization of link shortening.

Are link shorteners just a tricky way for people to link bait?

Do you remember the Cue Cat?  It was a device that was developed and marketed in the late 90’s that paired with codes in magazines so that you could wave the wand and go to a site.  It flopped miserably.

Will attempts to monetize shortened links be met with the same fate?